<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 62 yrs old mom by IVF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mymomsbest.com/daily/62-yrs-old-mom-by-ivf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mymomsbest.com/daily/62-yrs-old-mom-by-ivf/</link>
	<description>Pregnancy, Parenting, Breastfeeding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 07:51:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: heather</title>
		<link>http://www.mymomsbest.com/daily/62-yrs-old-mom-by-ivf/comment-page-1/#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 02:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymomsbest.com/daily/index.php/2006/07/09/%e2%80%98selfish%e2%80%99-late-motherhood-a-62-yrs-old-mom-by-ivf/#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>So crazy!  I mean I&#039;m not really sure how I feel about a woman of that age giving birth.  I mean sure she can do it because of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.topsurgeons.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;In Vitro Fertilization&lt;/a&gt; but does that make it okay.

I know people are living longer which makes it easier to worry about age less, but the kid&#039;s mother is likely going to be dead before they hit 30.  The whole thing just seems like a pretty selfish move.  Having kids past the age of 30 (the first child) greatly increases the risk for problems not only in the child, but also in the mother.  I guess she can risk her own health if she wants, but risking bringing a seriously unhealthy child into the world seems off to me.

I think that if any woman considers having a child past the age of 40 she should make sure to have serious and in depth amounts of prenatal care.  The child&#039;s saftey and health has to be of the utmost priority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So crazy!  I mean I&#8217;m not really sure how I feel about a woman of that age giving birth.  I mean sure she can do it because of <a href="http://www.topsurgeons.com" rel="nofollow">In Vitro Fertilization</a> but does that make it okay.</p>
<p>I know people are living longer which makes it easier to worry about age less, but the kid&#8217;s mother is likely going to be dead before they hit 30.  The whole thing just seems like a pretty selfish move.  Having kids past the age of 30 (the first child) greatly increases the risk for problems not only in the child, but also in the mother.  I guess she can risk her own health if she wants, but risking bringing a seriously unhealthy child into the world seems off to me.</p>
<p>I think that if any woman considers having a child past the age of 40 she should make sure to have serious and in depth amounts of prenatal care.  The child&#8217;s saftey and health has to be of the utmost priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

